Seven years after 9-11, we announce: "The W-Prize." This is a designated sum of money to support the lawful conviction of Americans involved with 9-11.

Feel free to discuss here the size you would like the W-Prize to be. The fee should do the following:

A. Not specifically reward anyone for providing testimony, but provide a financial incentive to government officials involved with 9-11 to break their secrecy agreement, and step forward.

B. The funds should be susbstantial enough to induce American citizens involved with 9-11 to have sufficient security protection to thwart expected US government retaliation for their cooperating

Seven years after 9-11, the United States government has produced not substantial evidence that Osama bin Ladin was connected with 9-11. Some believe the United States government was behind 9-11, and that the Taliban and others were led to believe that they -- alone -- were behind it.

It defies reason to believe 19 people -- on their own -- could orchestrate 9-11. The physical evidence makes a mockery of the 9-11 Commission Investigation. We have no reasonable explanation why the towers feel in the wrong order; why they fell at free-fall rates; why there were explosives captured on film. The NSA has yet to fully cooperate by providing all electronic transmissions of those who placed the explosives within the towers. We still have yet to hear a credible explanation why CIA offices in WTC7 suddenly disappeared in the explosion/building collapse/detonation.

This thread is intended to identify the specific dollar amounts you believe would induce the Americans involved with 9-11 to step forward; or for others with evidence of American involvement to point to that evidence.

A. Incentive to Remain Silent About American Involvement

Do you think those who know who placed the explosives in the WTC towers fear for their lives?

B. Security Guarantees

How much money do you believe will be sufficient to comfortably encourage people to step forward with infromation pointing to specific Americans and their involvement with 9-11?

C. Confidential Legal Memoranda

How much money do you believe the Member of Congress staff counsel would require to induce them to breach their secrecy agreement, and disclose evidence through the crime-fraud exception of other evidence the United States goernment has of American involvement with 9-11?

Perhaps the evidence collected may encourage the 9-11 widows, orphans and families to reconsider whether they were induced to agree to a cover-up; or other unspecified damages they can claim; or what other new lawsuits they might bring against the United States persons involved with this reckless abuse of American civilians.

Targeting American Lawyers with Collusion

The 9-11-fraud is linked with a reckless legal community rubber stamp. The legal community has not aggressively investigated facts, nor adequately explained seven years on why they have no substantial pool of convictions.

The domestic enemies are the lawyers who want to change the subject from the American collusion with 9-11, to foreign powers who had nothing to do with 9-11. The domestic enemy needs to be challenged.