I Don't THINK So.
I can’t believe I didn’t see where this was going.
Obama. Ayers. Annenberg. Acorn. Radical. Sound familiar?
If the debate about Obama and Ayers is whether they share any views, then this is where this is headed. The idea that some crazies have thrown around that Obama was secretly in on Brinks or some other shit like that is a nonsensical red herring.
This is what it’s really about.
From Education Week:
Back in April, Sol Stern, a scholar at the Manhattan Institute, wrote this piece on Ayers' ideas on social justice teaching. It's now getting a renewed life; the piece was posted this week on the Web site realclearpolitics, a go-to site for political junkies. Stern said that no one knows whether Obama agrees with those views. The next time Obama—the candidate who purports to be our next “education president”—discusses education on the campaign trail, it would be nice to hear what he thinks of his Hyde Park neighbor’s vision for turning the nation’s schools into left-wing indoctrination centers.
And they want to start "educating" our children even earlier in their young lives, with mandatory Pre-K. The sooner they can start teaching them how oppressive their country is. Truly despicable.
And tagging Ayers as an unapologetic left-wing radical is easy. For example, his speech to Hugo Chavez of Venezuela in 2006 explained the importance of education reform: “We share the belief that education is the motor-force of revolution” or “La educacion es revolucion!”.
“radicalize students to agitate for change”
“conduct programs to radicalize the students and politicize them. Reading, math and science achievement tests counted for little in the CAC grants, but the school’s success in preaching a radical political agenda determined how much money they got.
The CAC's agenda flowed from Mr. Ayers's educational philosophy, which called for infusing students and their parents with a radical political commitment, and which downplayed achievement tests in favor of activism.
So. See where this is going? Let me say, I think Ayers’ activities in the 60s were, and remain, abhorrent. I don’t think a social agenda is ever best pursued through violence, in fact, I think it undermines it. Gandhi, King, and Cesar Chavez all led great movements that achieved their goals through nonviolence. As Chavez put it: "Nonviolence is not inaction. It is not for the timid or the weak. It is hard work, it is the patience to win." Personally, I find it extremely odd that Ayers was accepted into mainstream Chicago, and while native Chicagoans may find nothing unusual about it, I don’t think most Americans are in agreement with them. To that extent, defending Ayers’ activities in the 60s seems a futile exercise in my mind. That said, the educational reforms he advocates, I agree with. And let’s be clear: he was most certainly not the first person, nor the last, to discuss the ideas of social justice in education. Notable educational theorists as Dewey and Freire discussed it, Dewey as far back as 1916.
And the history of teaching this way, and addressing social justice, has much deeper roots than even that. It is an essential tenet of Catholic teaching. It is about celebrating humanity, a concern for the poor, and promoting critical reflection. The Jesuits see it as an essential characteristic of Jesuit education: equality of opportunity for all, the principles of distributive and social justice, and the attitude of mind that sees service of others as more self-fulfilling than success or prosperity. Much of it is based on the teachings, as recorded in the New Testament, of Jesus Christ himself.
And nevermind that the person who donated money to this grant proposed by Ayers was a man who Reagan gave the Presidential Medal of Freedom to, nevermind that his wife is touted as a McCain endorsement...
But don’t you see? What Obama and Ayers are trying to do is turn your kids into a bunch of bomb-throwing terrorists. Right?
Here’s what this boils down to. I go to a Jesuit graduate school, and am pursuing a master's in elementary education. It is undoubtedly the most remarkable educational institution I have had the pleasure of attending. We speak of complex and important issues. We consider how to remove our own biases, as much as we can, from what we teach. We consider the experiences the students bring to the classroom. We cherish the diversity, and see it as an rich resource, rather than a barrier. We value not just math and literacy, but science, and history, and the arts, and music, and dance, and culture, and humanitarianism. Teaching for social justice has nothing to do with indoctrinating students. It's about giving them the tools to make the world a better place, and deciding for themselves where to use those tools. If you’d like a better picture of what teaching for social justice looks like? Well, let me show you.
It’s juniors learning about the United Farm Workers. Seventh and eighth graders advocating for peace. 14-year-olds celebrating the anniversary of the Universal
Declaration of Human Rights by exploring rights and abuses in the world. 7-year-olds marching to honor the contribution of MLK and
collecting food to feed those in need. It’s students working to understand how our democracy works. It’s fifth-graders registering voters, when they're not yet old enough to vote themselves. Elementary students raising money to send care
packages to the troops. 13-year-olds writing letters to advocate against child labor. It's kids raising money, one penny at a time, to help build
schools in rural areas of Pakistan
and Afghanistan. Fourth graders studying how to help with water conservation. Fifth graders writing letters to our soldiers overseas to thank them.
It's Logan Williams fifth grade class . They call themselves, the "Mill Run Poets for Peace." 149 young children, who through the power of their written word, expressed a better understanding of a situation in a far-off place, better than many adults could. 149 children, whose words are working to build schools for children their own age, in a place over 6,000 miles from them. So. Indoctrination? Tell it to the Poets for Peace. Tell it to the kids who think they can change the world now.





Rec'd. Wow, you did a ton of work. Great job!
October 9, 2008 8:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Oh. And by the way. Did you know that NCLB also contained a provision that required high schools to provide information about students, your children, to military recruiters?
http://www.leavemychildalone.org/
October 9, 2008 9:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
It is possible to opt out, and as weird as it seems, I did so for my eight-year-old! It's an option in one section of the lengthy standard permissions/releases form parents must fill out during registration every year in our school district.
I don't think all districts make it that easy though.
October 10, 2008 9:03 AM | Reply | Permalink
Doesn't seem weird at all. I had no idea until a couple days ago. My son's two. Think I can opt out this early? ;)
October 10, 2008 3:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hilary, Hilary, Hilary -- you bomb throwing terrorist ! You left leaning pinko of a beach girl. And you're going to be a teacher?
What's next. Integration of schools. Good God, woman--don't ya know your place.
October 9, 2008 10:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
Jesuits? Terrorists? Children? Hmmmm....
Remember, remember the Fifth of November,
The Gunpowder Treason and Plot to surrender,
I know of no reason
Why the Gunpowder Treason
Should ever be forgot.
Guy Fawkes, Guy Fawkes, t'was his intent
To blow up King and Parli'ment.
Three-score barrels of powder below
To prove old England's overthrow;
By God's providence he was catch'd
With a dark lantern and burning match.
Holloa boys, holloa boys, let the bells ring.
Holloa boys, holloa boys, God save the King!
October 10, 2008 2:15 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah, but that drawn- and -quartered deal was mighty rough. Who knew you were Antonia Fraizer moose-dude?
Fawkes, Fawkes-- was really a Faux
His powder was wet so it was a no-go.
When he went underground he was looking on high
A failed terrorist but a hell of a Guy.
October 10, 2008 11:05 AM | Reply | Permalink
does fawkes have an avatar
October 13, 2008 12:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well, after hearing some of the comments coming from that crowd at the Palin-McCain rally, maybe they think it is too liberal for us to teach kids that it's probably not the right thing to do to yell "Commie faggot" at people just because they're supporting someone else. Maybe that is too radical for them.
Herbert Kohl sums it up nicely:
"It is a sad statement on the moral sensibility of our schools and society that one has to advocate for teaching for social justice.
As one of my elementary school students once told me, "You know, Mr. Kohl, you can get arrested for stirring up justice."
October 10, 2008 8:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
Next you'll call for banning Creationism in the schools. All of us real church- going Americans will have to move to Alaska.
October 10, 2008 12:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's amazing the depth and perception to be found here on TPM. Thanks so much for this, Hilary.
October 10, 2008 1:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yes: Paulo Freire! The enemy of whom was/is: far-right wing radical Reaganites.
And who was Freire? A teacher who taught only critical thinking. And for that he "earned" the enmity of the far-right wing radical establishment which opposes all forms and degrees of equality.
He was essentially a tenant-side lawyer who threatened non-violently to persuade by reason the landlord to act responsibly.
I knew nothing about you, Hilary, until this post. I'm in love! :)
October 10, 2008 1:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
Indeed. And to understand his writings one must understand his own life.
And teachers who believe in the notion of teaching for social justice, well, we read Freire (who I disagree with in some places), Dewey, Giroux, and others. We read contemporary texts on the idea, and we form our own opinions of of what it means and how to do it. We read critics of the idea and those who believe education should take a different form. The City Journal article states: "Neither list included advocates of a knowledge-based and politically neutral curriculum, such as E. D. Hirsch Jr. or Diane Ravitch." (In reference to a list of curriculum materials for teacher education courses.)
Well, we actually did read Hirsch in class, but I've been reading him for a lot longer than that. I agree with him on a lot. As is usually the case, I find myself wondering who creates these "educational debates" when it seems clear to me the answer is "both." Or somewhere in between.
October 10, 2008 8:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well nice read, Hilary. Your comments are usually quite penetrating -- nice to see you work with a blank canvas of your own.
October 10, 2008 1:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
Commie Dupes. Gotta start 'em young.
October 10, 2008 2:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
Heaven knows the right sure does!
October 10, 2008 6:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
Does anyone have any information about the work Ayers actually did in Chicago? I've been scouring teh internets, but all I find are right-wing rants about his forcing a liberal agenda on students. Only problem is that they have no proof of this and are basing it on his past, as Hilary and all of us know.
I did find this book here though. The only negative reviews are from those who (surprise) didn't read it.
October 10, 2008 2:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
When they say this, they're talking about the educational theory he espouses, in this case, teaching for social justice. He's written many books on the topic. But, like I say, he's not the first person to write on it and he won't be the last. It was also the ideal behind the methods of the Annenberg Challenge that he worked with Obama on.
Here's something he wrote recently:
http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/eduwonkette/2008/04/guest_blogger_bill_ayers_on_so_1.html
You can see his works on Amazon or also, I think they're listed on the Wiki, or also on his website, billayers.org. I found his CV the other day but I can't seem to turn it up again.
October 10, 2008 8:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
"Peace"? Now, that's a radical, commie concept, these kids should be play-dressing in flight suits on aircraft carriers under "Mission Accomplished" banners.
October 10, 2008 2:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
Beautiful post! Bless you. I like the way you integrated so much here.
October 10, 2008 6:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
"Service above self"
October 10, 2008 8:15 AM | Reply | Permalink
Back when Monica Goodling et al were screening applicants at DoJ, the phrase "social justice" in any of the candidates' writings was grounds for immediate disqualification. They've been at this for some time now...
October 10, 2008 11:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
Ugh. I had forgotten about that.
October 10, 2008 11:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
The problem is Obama has decided to say that he was only 8 when Ayers was building bombs and that he thought Ayers had been rehabilitated by the time he met him in Chicago.
http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/1008/Obama_on_Ayers_I_assumed_he_had_been_rehabilitated.html?showall
Can you see where that is going?
October 10, 2008 12:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
Many voters don't know history and default to the most basic information. That was a reason for not bringing up the Keating Five. From a tactical viewpoint, the question for Obama's team NOW is how much to explain? I'd opt for "I was eight years old" and just lump the issue into the "McCain -character- attacks- of -desperation" category.
There doesn't seem to be any appetite at this point for more complicated explanations of anything. It's pretty much down to punch by punch, only Obama's scoring because of the economy.
The primaries were more involved. The Wright issue by example.
We can fight it out here but what impact do you think it might actually have among voters?
October 10, 2008 1:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
As for Ayers, his political "bio" seems typically weird-weatherman--devoid of political reality, the violence more of a personal choice and quest rather than any kind of reasoned political act. The problem here is that he won't cop to it. Unless I'm missing something.
October 10, 2008 1:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
I don't think you've missed anything. How many undecided voters are going to get into the grants made by Annenberg? Or the timeline of when and where Obama met Ayers? I think the general mentality is, we've got bigger fish to fry. Of the independents I've spoken with, the general consensus about Ayers seems to be:
Obama minimized their relationship, McCain and co. are blowing it out of proportion, it's ridiculous to be calling Obama a terrorist, and we don't really give a shit. What are you going to do about the economy?
What I'm sort of amazed at, and I'm guilty here too, is that for a week or so after the bailout and campaign suspension stunt, the McCain campaign was saying, OUT LOUD, we're going to change the subject away from the tanking economy. Over and over again. And we LET THEM. I haven't seen any posts around here on the economy this week, have you? And haven't we lost something like 50% of the value of the DOW in one year? 21% or so in the last week? If I'm not mistaken, for the couple years following Black Tuesday, the stock market lost...yep, 89% of it's value since it's peak. Well. We're doing great. At this rate, we'll definitely break that record!
October 10, 2008 2:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hilary. A minor aside. I'm thinking you're mad about the situation because, speaking historically, I've never seen you use CAPS.
Great post BTW.
October 10, 2008 3:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well, I'll be really pissed if they manage to demonize this educational reform. And I'm pissed that we seem completely incapable of preventing them from changing the subject. And I'm pissed at what I've been seeing out of these McCain crowds lately. It's scary. And worrisome.
But, as to the caps, I was really just too lazy to put in more html code for italics. ;)
October 10, 2008 3:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
Dow schmow. We got bigger fish to fry here at TPM. Like....
Apparently McCain's a pussy.
I donno about you, but I put the house on the market when I heard that. The wife had to be run into Emergency. The children stopped learning. And the sea began to fall.
I mean... who knew?
October 10, 2008 5:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
Gone to hell, moose. The situation is all fawked up. I've always wondered if old Guy became famous for the plot or because his name was kind of WTF.
October 10, 2008 6:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
How to reconcile supporting Gandhi, MLK and passive resistance, while supporting Ayers and planting nail-embedded bombs?
Doesn't something give somewhere?
October 10, 2008 7:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
Who supports Ayers and planting bombs? Not me.
October 10, 2008 10:12 PM | Reply | Permalink