McCain Accuses Economy of Bias
The Republican presidential hopeful John McCain let his frustration with the US economy for torpedoing his campaign boil over today. When asked in an interview about the challenges his campaign faces, McCain responded, "Look, it's no secret that the economy favors my opponent." Asked to elaborate, he replied, "This country is in crisis. Now is the not the time to point fingers. But everybody knows that the economy caused this crisis, and I think everybody knows why it's doing it."
Separately, Steve Schmidt, who is the top strategist for the McCain campaign, called the economy a "pro-Obama institution..uh...organization...whatever, it's pro-Obama." He added,
This is an economy that is completely, totally, 150 percent in the tank for the Democratic candidate. Everything that happens to the economy should be evaluated by the American people from that perspective.
Challenged by reporters to defend the accusation, Schmidt continued:
The economy could have gone sour at any point in the past four years or the next for years. You have to ask yourself why now? Who stands to gain? Why, on the same day that John McCain declared that the fundamentals of our economy were strong, would the Dow Jones suddenly tumble 300 points? Some people might call it a coincidence. I call it spite.
Asked why the economy might bear ill will towards the campaign, Schmidt answered, "I have no idea. Go ask the economy."
But others have suggested that the economy, which has been increasingly fragile in recent years, feels disrespected by John McCain, whose priority in the Senate has been military affairs and earmark reform. McCain's blunt acknowledgment that "I know a lot less about economics than I do about military and foreign policy issues," may have particularly incited the economy's wrath.
According to traditional economic theory, economies follows strict mathematical rules and lack any independent agency of their own, but many economists have recently embraced the controversial new theory of Agent-Based Economics which asserts that economies have feelings too. The theory offers support to McCain's assertion that the economy has it out for him. Former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan has accused the economy of engaging in malicious behavior, calling it "the worst economy I've ever seen" and "a corrosive force." Dr. Richard S. Satrams, Professor of Economics at Prestigious University, was even more direct:
Much to the dismay of my colleagues, the economy is a capricious and unpredictable beast. Whether driven by chance or animus, I cannot say, but it surely has John McCain by the balls and shows no sign of letting go. One suspects that it seeks another trophy to hang next to [former President] Jimmy Carter's peanuts.
The Obama campaign immediately ridiculed McCain's accusations, stating in a press release that "John McCain is so out-of-touch that he wouldn't recognize the economy if it collapsed on his doorstep. Any of his doorsteps."
Late update: The McCain campaign has just released evidence which they claim proves that the economy is against John McCain. The scrap of paper appears to so show the angry scrawl of a clearly disturbed and bitter economy. The authenticity of the document has not been established.--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





And those damned airplanes crashed themselves, too!
October 6, 2008 7:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
The question is, what do we really know about the economy?
Who are its friends? What church did it go to?
October 6, 2008 7:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
Friggin' godless economy.
In God We Trust!
It's on coins. Can't trust a goddamned economy, not even filled up as it is with God-fearing coins.
October 6, 2008 8:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
The economy is a Muslim.
October 6, 2008 7:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
No, but it is a terrorist.
October 6, 2008 8:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
In fact, Islamic finance would have avoided this whole fiasco!
October 6, 2008 8:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
Rather, it pals round with them.
More important, the economy played the race card first, back during Katrina. All those billions of dollars for those with the unfair advantage of being broke, who just "happened to be" African-American. If not for that, they'd still be living in trailers.
And who gets hurt the most in the Wall Street meltdown? Katrina victims? What about people like Hank Paulson, who have to watch their portfolios lose millions of dollars? Those Katrina "victims" sure aren't losing any sleep!
Rachel Maddow had Steve King on her show, and he was proud to say he not only voted against the bailout, he voted against Katrina aid!
October 6, 2008 8:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
The economy is a troll
October 7, 2008 5:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
A spokesperson for the economy stated that the 'angry scrawl' was actually written by none other than John McCain during a recent psychotic episode where he voted for the bail out and then asked President Bush to veto the bail out (the one that the President had urged congress to pass), he then pretended to 'be' the economy and scrawled the angry words ' I am the economy and I am against you John McCain'.
Chevy Chase was quoted as saying 'I told you a month ago... McCain has lost his mind'.
A spokesperson from the McCain camp responded 'We will be releasing evidence that Senator Obama has had intimate relations with the economy both as a state senator and a US senator. No, wait if we keep talking about the economy we will lose... um... Barack Hussein Obama is a terrorist... Ayers...and we are concerned about exactly 'who' is funding his campaign.
October 6, 2008 8:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Who? Why, it's the economy, stupid!
October 6, 2008 11:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
Clever double-entendre, you rainbow person, you!
October 7, 2008 10:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
Meanwhile, Energy Independence, which in some early speculation was said to be flirting with the idea of endorsing McCain, now is rumored to be seriously considering siding with the Obama-Biden ticket.
October 7, 2008 12:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
"Damn you, Friedman!!!"
October 7, 2008 4:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
I know of two other abstract nouns with very strong Democratic bias (in fact they're among the worst partisan hacks): reality and truth.
October 7, 2008 7:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
This post was worth recommending just for the headline alone. And it's quite possible that it will be McCain's attack next week.:)
October 7, 2008 8:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
Wow. This is the biggest US conspiracy theory ever. The economy is conspiring NOT to elect John McCain...I like the idea that McCain is blaming the broader economy for conspiring against him. This makes the 911 conspiracy theories seem like the revealed truth.
Or perhaps because BUSH and the repubs in fact = the economy, it is really BUSH who is conspiring not to elect McCain. Maybe Bush doesn't want McCain elected because he might rewrite history books by cleaning up all of Bush's mess in a Mavericky way! The Bush record would be sullied, heaven forbid, more so than it already is. Perish the thought.
I wonder though if somewhere in this conspiracy theory there is a very simple equation to explain what has happened. Something along the lines of: Bush ignorance x Cheney meglomania (over) hegemonic war + fiscal wrecklessness = Tragic US Economic Reality...
Whatever, Bush and the repubs have left us, and President Obama, with a modern day version of Fermat's last theorem. How do we solve this exponential problem?
October 7, 2008 10:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
You mean elliptic curves won't work? I know... let's put toilet water on it!
October 7, 2008 10:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
Only half in jest, the big question of the time is whether this set of problems is NP-complete?
If only we could assign some RoadRunner resources to the question... If only it were that easy...
October 7, 2008 11:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
Party foul. No nerd-jokes on this thread. Not even nerd-half-jests. You're banished to techcrunch for 3 days.
October 7, 2008 11:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
Oh how I wish it were a joke! I've had a suspicion that the current administration and their friends in congress had a plan to leave the economy in such a state of disarray that the next Democratic administration would be unable to put it back together, and be pinned with blame for the condition of the nation's economic infrastructure.
The result would be, if they have their way, resurgence of power in 2012 to continue (or, in the worst case) complete their plans for a permanent change in the structure of our economy.
I'll admit that the "NP-complete" part was a joke. But I fear that the problems that are presented to us are indeed a perfect storm,the people who started it know damn well what they've done, and believe they are close to success. I for one have no idea how to counter these trends.
In a rational world, the monumental overreach of an administration behaving like the Cheney/bush administration would produce a tsunami of backlash from all over this country. Yet, we see that this set of actions has not and I suspect they will not trigger the necessary corrective move toward balance.
Perhaps we are trying to solve transcendental problems with rational solutions... :-)
October 7, 2008 11:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
You assign way too much competence to this lot of fools.
October 7, 2008 11:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
See what you've done? Now abroadabroad has latched onto NP-completeness. Before we know it, this thread will turn into an all-out geek-fest. If you retract the completeness reference and promise never to refer to computational theory in one of my threads, I'll let you off the hook.
That goes for you too, abroad! Just b/c you didn't start it doesn't mean that you're not culpable for spreading the hysteria.
October 7, 2008 11:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
I give up.
October 7, 2008 11:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
NP-complete it is not. Time is fortunately the problem solver.
But it sort of begs the questions whether there's some hyper-gymnastic Japanese-born equation that might accelerate the "time" requirement. The Nip-Cats have, afterall, been through a smaller, dry run of this economic problem. They call it the Lost Decade.
October 7, 2008 11:34 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well put! Though I have an argument anyway...
My question was not whether "things will change", or "will we still have a country" in due time, it's a different question:
Is a solution *computable*?
I suspect not.
October 7, 2008 11:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
Very surely an important question. But only insofar as a negative answer serves to rule out spending time in a futile search for a tractable solution.
It has been my humble experience that the computability question is best left bypassed in cases where there is no obvious mapping to a proven incomputable problem - the time is better spent first looking for a tractable solution, and only subsequently investigating computability if one cannot be readily found.
I am willing to explore 700 billion possible solutions. ;)
October 7, 2008 12:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
The question of "computability" is mostly geekspeak which I engage in rarely, due to getting kicked out of all the cool parties... The kernel of truth that makes it "funny" (a bit of a stretch...) is not so much whether these questions are computable but whether it's possible to conceive of some set of actions which provide hope of escape from this situation.
October 7, 2008 2:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
Holy crap. It actually took a minute to figure out that this was snark.
It must be really bad when one cannot determine if McCain's paranoia is his actual paranoia vs. a writer's well-written satire of his paranoia.
Gawd help us if this dink gets anywhere near the WH.
October 7, 2008 12:27 PM | Reply | Permalink