« Obama isn't cutting taxes - he's providing welfare | MiddleClassBill's Blog | WSJ - Obama's 95% illusion »

Obama is all about dirty politics - it's the Chicago way!!!


We should all be very grateful that Barack Obama has been able to rig his previous political elections.  If he wasn't so slimy he'd never be in this position to be our next President.
In 2004, Obama wins the US Senate race by getting his opponent's divorce records made public and causes Jack Ryan to step down.  Obama easily beats Alan Keyes who replaced Jack Ryan.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Ryan_(Senate_candidate)

And of course before that, in the primary, Blair Hull was leading in the polls over Obama until "someone" mysteriously leaked sealed court documents to the press regarding his divorce.
And let's not forget that he eliminated some of his opponents by invalidating their petitions.  People "signed" their names instead of "printing".  
http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/05/29/obamas.first.campaign/index.html

Thank God Obama is so good at playing dirty politics.

43 Comments

| Leave a comment

As opposed to John McCain, who was an Annapolis failure and a demonstrably incompetent pilot who got where he was because his father and grandfather, both Admirals, put the fix in for him. Who gave the North Vietnamese military information leading to the shooting down of more American pilots in order to gain preferential treatment for himself. Who divorced his first, badly injured wife in order to marry a beer heiress (who herself committed crimes in order to feed her drug addiction), who cheats on her with a lobbyist, who was one of the Keating Five, in their S & L deregulation precursor to the current banking crisis, who is running a notably racist campaign.

You clearly, then, prefer an unstable, corrupt liar for president. Why is that?

I was not saying that McCain is a saint. But just trying to present a balanced side to all of the people on this site who think Obama can do no wrong, is the model of integrity, etc.

A racist campaign?

I must be racist too because I don't like having Barry raise my taxes. I must also be a racist because I think Barry's got less foreign policy experience than McCain. God I feel terrible. I'll have to pray for all the other racists like me

There's nothing whatsoever balanced about you, and in that I include psychological imbalance.

And yes, as I said in response to your blather in another thread, noticeably darkening Obama's face in ads, juxtaposing (look it up, thumbsucker) him with white faces, especially in that repulsive, demonstrably false and disproven "sex education" ad, yes, that's racist. And so are you, for excusing it.

Wow - I am imbalanced now too. It's funny that nobody is trying to refute my original argument that Obama played dirty politics in his early elections.

That might be due to it having been debunked long ago. It's only relevant for racists like you who have little else to play these days.

Go crawl back into your mom's basement.

OK. Who debunked it? I must have missed that one.

Isn't it a fact that two people that Obama was running against both dropped out of those races for information that was leaked to the press? Isn't it also a fact that he challenged the signatures on his opponents' petitions?

You're not going to get an answer to that one. He just knows those things were "debunked." If you ask him when, how and by whom, you'll just make him grouchy. He's a worker. They don't get royal jelly.

Who asked you, punk?

Punk? See how dumb lack of royal jelly makes you? Without the jelly, the brain can't develop. You have to stay away from the workers if you don't have the hive scent on you. They'll tear you apart. The old ones gum you until the younger ones come and take a real bite.

Not to take away from the point of your post, but bees don't bite.

Ants. Check out Hellstrom's Hive if you haven't read it lately. Frank Herbert. Little gem. Not the same scale as the Dune books, but brilliant.

I haven't, but thanks for the rec. I've been looking for something other than politics to read after this is all over. I'll order it tonight.

He successfully challenged invalid nominating petitions. That's been well-covered. Explain, if you're able (doubt it) how that's "dirty politics.

So vote for McCain. There are two choices, you know.

"Mike Ryan", You are trollish. Your post is an attack on the basis of character. I suggest you read the Rolling Stone article on Senator McCain if you really are interested in the character of the Presidential candidates. McCain is clever, and has brilliantly developed and spread a myth about his character in the media. He is really stikingly similar to George Bush in terms of personal history and character, although military-style, and without the Godliness and recovery from his compulsive gambling. The Rolling Stone article is an interesting read, but you sound rather rigid in your thinking, so you will probably need to disbelieve what it says about the character of Mr. McCain, namely: he is all about John McCain--exactly what you accuse Obama of. How else could you explain the choice of someone so profoundly unfit to assume the Presidency as Ms. Palin, given the age and medical history that Mr. McCain has? It is the act of a gambler. Mr. McCain is no "maverick". Have a good day, "Mike Ryan", you troll.

Again. It's not surprising that people go off topic. I'm a troll? I was simply pointing out that Obama and McCain both play dirty politics. I didn't even bring up Palin.

Wow - there's a lot of anger out there. No one wants to debate the facts around Obama's earlier elections.

When you bring facts rather than misrepresentations, we'll happily debate them. Until then, go away.

And you're goddamned right there's a lot of anger out here. Anger at the ongoing disasters of the Bush years. Anger at trolls like you who will lie in order to try and continue those disastrous policies. Anger at what has happened to our country because of those policies, and anger at those policies and those who espouse them.

It's righteous anger, and your options at this point are either to get out of the way or become a recipient of that righteous anger. Nothing else.

I haven't seen any facts here, merely your assertions. You are peddling guilt by association without showing any back-up for those assertions.

What you are getting back are other, equally valid assertions.

If you want to debate facts, show how the press leaks are proven to have ties to Senator Obama, and that he, rather than his party, were behind the signature challenges.

I myself have never seen any, but if you have, bring it.

Isn't it a fact that two people that Obama was running against both dropped out of those races for information that was leaked to the press? Isn't it also a fact that he challenged the signatures on his opponents' petitions?

Neither of your assertions come to the threshold of "rigging the election" Perhaps you'd like to retract? You're backpeddling like mad, anyway.

I think forcing your opponents to drop out would equate to rigging an election.

Really? I'd call it hard, smart politics.

I think Mr "Middle Class Bill" similar to DemBill I am guessing....

That you are trying to lay some nasty accusations here that don't bear out. You want to blame Senator Obama for things that he did not 'actually' do. However McCain has 'actually' done enough and is mentally and emotionally so messed up that I would never trust him with the security and well being of my daughter or this country. And Palin... let's just leave her out of it because that woman doesn't belong in the white house for so many reasons I couldn't stop once I got started.

You have a right to your opinion but you'll have to do better than that if you 'really' did intend to bring some balance here. Doesn't seem like that was your real intention anyway...

Mike, you're in the Hive. Your blog doesn't have hive scent on it. They are going to swarm you, bite you to death and dump you in the vats. I know you accept that risk, because you could not have wandered in here by mistake. If you poke these ants, you are going to get bitten. What's the point? You thinking you'll change a vote?

You happen to be a Naderite? I'm looking for a Naderite to swap votes with.

Still not over Hillary, are you, Billy Sad?

I put that woman down long ago. Drones that get the royal jelly know that. Should tell you something about what the Hive has been feeding you.

Don't try to figure out what I'm getting at. It will just make you angrier.

People, chill. All political viewpoints are welcome here.

I am curious. Did the poster object to the campaign tactics of President Bush in both 2000 and 2004? Namely, the sliming of John McCain in North Carolina with the "black Baby lovechild" nonsense, and the swiftboating of John Kerry?

In the light of the last 8 years of Rovian slime we've all be subjected to by the GOP, you inference that he had something to do with the press leaks, and allegations of voter suppression seem fairly minor, frankly.

It is par for the course for the opposing party to challenge signatures. I doubt that was driven by Obama. As for the press leaks, there is simply no evidence he was behind that. You don't expect anyone to hold Obama personally responsible for this, do you?

Did people hold Bush personally responsible for the slime his campaign threw at McCain in 2000?

Like I said, my point was that all politicians are slimy - even Barry Obama.

All politicians are Slimy. Sure. Some more than others. Tell folks something they didn't know, wouldja?

Obama has run a pretty clean campaign. I suggest that this doesn't add much to the conversation.

There is such a thing as degree. That is one thing that folks on the right pretend isn't a factor, but it is. The clerk that swipes a melonball from the saladbar and the cashier that pockets $500 a night out of the till are not morally equivalent.

That appears to be your argument here. There's an old saying, before you point out the sliver in my eye, tend to the beam in your own.

It applies here.

Billy, you are saying the initial post wasn't a bit provocative, just a "different scent"? One could voice legitimate concerns about either candidate in a constructive way. This post began with name calling and character slurs. Trollish.

Well, I'd normally agree. But since the echo chamber has deteriorated into a Hive, all of the pro-Obama and anti-McCain/Palin stuff has the same sleazy, vicious tone. We've got a most recommended now that screams about punching Palin in the face.

The Hive scent on the anti-McCain/Palin stuff keeps you from seeing that it is just as vile.

My point is most of the blogs are trollish. Only difference is some have the Hive scent and some don't.

There are exceptions, of course.

Then why condone it at all, as you're doing here?

If you keep dissing bees, don't be surprised if one flies in your window and nails you. Bees are great little critters.

I wouldn't disparage them.

Billy Glad - sorry I can't help you with your Nader search. I'm a member of ACORN and have already voted multiple times.

I'm curious about why you're not having much success hurting Obama with that ACORN, Fannie Mae, Freddy Mac stuff. Why do you think it's not working with the voters? Must be frustrating.

up stream you claim the old grouch is a worker. just curious. how would you characterize yourself? i've been following the cafe pretty closely the past couple months. your posts and responses usually strike me as having some sorta axe to grind. am i wrong? if not, what's up? what's bugging you man?

If you've only been eating the Hive food, you might not be able to understand the answer. But I'll give it a shot.

One of the reasons my posts and responses are off-putting, though not quite "other," is that I eat enough of the Hive food (think of what I read, watch, hear) to have a little Hive scent myself. Not enough to fool a worker, of course. The fact that I'm even a little different is enough to anger them. But I smell enough like the Hive to be tolerated by the smarter ants.

I don't think anything anyone says here will make the slightest difference in the election. And I don't think many people who write here think it will. We all do this for our own reasons. I do it to entertain a few friends and to work through interesting issues before I post them somewhere else.

I support Obama, but not because I think he'll be a better President than McCain. I just think he won't veto or obstruct any of Hillary Clinton's initiatives and McCain will. So I'm happy to pass the torch to the Obamanauts. They can have the Party. As I've argued, the proper role for the Clintonistas now is the role of the guerrilla, pushing our legislation through the Congress.

There is a single exception to that thought I'm trying to work through.

I believe Obama's thought that Affirmative Action should be based on income going forward is a thought that is head and shoulders above anything anyone -- including Clinton -- has uttered this year. I don't know if he means it or not. I'd like to figure out whether he does or not, and how he would get there from here. I wish he would say more.

As I've said before, I don't like lies and liars on either side. And I don't like cheap shots, no matter who takes them. I don't like morons. And I don't like to be attacked. I try never to throw the first punch, but never to fail to hit back. There is bad blood in the Hive that goes back to the beginning of the year. There are people I don't like and people who don't like me.

Hope that helps.

MiddleClassBill, you bring up a good point, which is our tendency to want to see our leaders in an idealized way. To be sure Obama has his flaws and less-than-attractive attributes. To deny this is always a mistake. He is somewhat preening, and may be ruthlessly ambitious underneath the cool demeanor, willing to say and do anything to advance his ambition, although this hasn't been my impression. If you are truly concerned about character of the candidates, do yourself a favor and read the article on McCain in Rolling Stone. Sociopathic behaviors can be acts of commission, or omission/misrepresentation. McCain seems disturbingly narcissistic, somewhat sociopathic and histrionic in my opinion, if there is truth to the portrayal in the Rolling Stone article. Like Bush, his overriding motivation seems to be achieving more than his father or grandfather. Everything is a means to that end; everything else is secondary to this "life mission". This perspective explains an underlying consistency in what superficially appears to be inconsistent behavior he has exhibited recently, in comparison to his his past "more maverick" days.

Sliminess is particularly concerning to me as well, since it is a social manifestation of an unhealthy personality. Richard Nixon was slimy and had a paranoid personality. Jack Kennedy was deeply flawed, narcissistic, probably not so slimy. I am not certain that Obama is any more or less slimy than McCain, or Clinton. My observation is that he seems more capable of healthy attachment and relationships in life, which is a sign of a healthier personality. I can't imagine him calling Michelle "a trollop", for example, although I do wonder whether that may be a term of endearment for the McCain's.

What would be constructive would be to provide a link to the material you are referencing. What is the source for the allegations regarding Obama? All politicians have been known to engage in misrepresenting their opponents.

Just ignore the OP. He says that he is from New York, he just blew in here today, for the first time, and he is going to tell us all about "the Chicago way". He is just an agent provocateur. You will see many more like him showing up here during the remaining days of the campaign.

All he has is a bunch of Republican disinformation propaganda, and, since he is not even a Chicago or Illinois Republican, but a guy from New York, he is just posting what he was been paid to do.

edit: what he has been paid to do.

That is really depressing. I do better stuff for free. :) Anyway, I think it's better.

Leave a comment

MiddleClassBill

user-pic

Following: 0
Followers: 0

Posts
Comments & Recommends


Favorites

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address