« Hot off the PRESSES, Sarah Palin has no idea who HAMAS is. DISQUALIFIED | sgwhiteinfla's Blog | Its Not About Cocaine or Terrorists! »

TIME TO PUNCH PALIN IN HER FACE!!!


Sarah Palin has stepped across the line one time too many.  Its what they would call on the "Chappelle Show" habitual line stepping.  Its time for Debbie Wasserman Shultz or Claire McCaskill or another female Obama surrogate to go ahead and turn this tramp over their knees and spank her ass like the petulant little child she is.  Its not as if there isn't a plethora of good material to use.  At some point we have to draw the line in the sand and say that just because Sarah Palin is a woman doesn't mean she can say what ever in the hell she wants to!

Trooper-Gate, Disability Gate, Earmark Queen, Child Abuser,  Liar, Idiot.  These are just a few of the topics that need to be CRUSHING Sarah Palin for the next 4 weeks of this election.  I mean if we aren't going to attack her we might as well roll over and play dead.  The next thing you know she will be saying Barack Obama is a coward and is going to give up and surrender in Iraq.  Oh wait, I forgot, SHE ALREADY DID THAT with 80 million Americans watching.  My blood is seriously boiling right now and I HOPE that Obama's is as well behind the scenes.  Before I go any further I guess I should address what she said THIS TIME. These are just a few of the topics that need to be CRUSHING Sarah Palin for the next 4 weeks of this election.  I mean if we aren't going to attack her we might as well roll over and play dead.  The next thing you know she will be saying Barack Obama is a coward and is going to give up and surrender in Iraq.  Oh wait, I forgot, SHE ALREADY DID THAT with 80 million Americans watching.  My blood is seriously boiling right now and I HOPE that Obama's is as well behind the scenes.  Before I go any further I guess I should address what she said THIS TIME.

"There's been a lot of interest in what I read lately.  Well, I was reading my copy of today's New York Times and I was really interested to read about Barack's friends from Chicago.  Turns out, one of his earliest supporters is a man who, according to The New York Times was a domestic terrorist and part of a group that, quote, 'launched a campaign of bombings that would target the Pentagon and the U.S. Capitol.'  These are the same guys who think patriotism is paying higher taxes.  This is not a man who sees America as you and I do - as the greatest force for good in the world. This is someone who sees America as imperfect enough to pal around with terrorists who targeted their own country. This, ladies and gentlemen, has nothing to do with the kind of change anyone can believe in - not my kids and not your kids. The only man who can take on Washington is John McCain."

Now two days ago this DUMB BIOTCH couldn't even name ONE newspaper she has read.  Today she is misquoting the NYT article that actually said the OPPOSITE of what she said.  I know conventional wisdom is saying don't attack her because people will feel sorry for her.  But I also know this and I will probably catch some hell from some people about this but its my believe and I have seen it so its also my experience:  When a woman abuses a man over and over again if that man ever defends himself the people who have seen the whole saga don't harbor ill will towards him most of the time.  On the contrary in fact a lot of the times a man who allows himself to be attacked over a long period of time he tends to be come the subject of ridicule being called weak or henpecked by both men and women alike.  If a Sarah Palin is bold enough to come out her slanderous mouth that  Obama is palling around with terrorist then she had better be woman enough to withstand getting attacked about being a child abuser.  She needs to be ready to get attacked for LYING repeatedly to the American people.  She needs to be ready to be attacked for using our tax dollars like a federal welfare system for her state of Alaska.  But bigger than that WE need to be ready to attack HER and shut her damn mouth.  Its hard to throw punches when you are constantly eating them!

I know that this diary won't change anything but dammit I needed to vent.  I could take it when McCain and his cronies were making these lines.  At least they are out there to try to defend them.  She hides out in a bat cave and only comes out to make attacks.  We need to NUKE  her ass from her hiding place with our OWN attacks and then she will HAVE to talk to the MSM or risk allowing us to shape her narrative.  We need to DEMAND that this happens. 


51 Comments

| Leave a comment

Dial your language down. I am completely against the McCain/Palin ticket, but you can not use that type of violence laced language, to make your points.

There are far too many battered women, one is one too many, to talk in such violent terms about any woman.

user-pic

I am so in agreement. To me the title was disturbing. And I'd hate some crazed person to be tempted to harm her physically.

I'm extremely troubled by her. But I think her self-inflicted damage (and the media play of that) is sufficient.

user-pic

He has a point about who don't fight back when attacked by a woman. 'Course, if he does, she's gets a ratraining order -- rubber-stamped -- against HIM.

Certainly women are battered (so are men), and I'm against that. But let's ignore the reverse; let's pretend Sarah has legitimate grounds for pretending to be a victim/INCAPABLE of accepting responsibility for HER foul mouth and what comes out of it.

Not so by the way: My mother could arouse a corpse to anger -- and not leave a mark. But let's pretend the corpse "asked for it".

Cosigned.

I agree. Dial it way back, sarge. You're out of line.

I am not dialing back a damn thing. When she dials it back, I will dial it back. How is that for ya?

Where is Bud White? Seems like there's never a cop around when you need one.

You seem to have trouble keeping things on a verbal level, sarge. You need to use your words. You could have said the same things, just as emphatically, without the physical violence.

Wasserman Schultz could give her a tongue lashing. Wouldn't that satisfy you?

user-pic

I agree. Genuine equality, not lip-sercive based upon woman-battering realities to which Palin is NOT being subjected.

Why must we always have the defense of women dragged into every discussion about a thug who happens to be female? Changing the subject, anyone?

I think we'd be more impressed if you heroes weren't so completely anonymous.

WHile I think they are falling really low and I am disgusted, I agree with the other 2 responses that reacting violently doesn't help.
Regarding to links with terrorism, I think it is much more relevant to investigate the right wing connections with the people behind the Oklahoma City bombing. That was the worst attack of domestic terrorism, and it was perpetrated by people that it is very likely to become more active if Obama wins. They simply wouldn't tolerate Obama. Sincerely, I am much more worried by those than by a guy that was a 60's radical, but has been a good citizen since then.

Look I am not a Democrat, I am a registered independent who is supporting the democratic nominee so I dont feel the need to play by your rules of etiquette and neither it seems does the GOP. There is a reason that a lot of people are independents now adays. It mostly because they don't want to be associated with the Democratic party which is almost universally seen as weak. How many times do you have to get hit upside your head before you fight back? Any person that can read can see that in my blog I advocated attacking her verbally and by women no less. But because some Democrats are squeamish they want me to back off??? This while she is basically saying Barack Obama doesnt qualify to be president, that he doesnt love his country, that he is a coward and a traitor, and that he is a terrorist by association. All while I may add she avoids any press conferences where she might have to answer tough questions and while avoiding testifying her own trooper gate scandal. And the funny thing is in all this time NO DEMOCRAT HAS CALLED HER OUT ON ALL THIS LOW HANGING FRUIT. Now everyone initially said dont attack her because it would only help them. Luckily a chosen few didnt listen and more and more of her lies were exposed and now her popularity is plumetting. Well I say keep hitting her own the way down!!! Dont just knock her off the pedestal, BURY HER ASS! If she was a man would you be saying the same thing about backing off in light of the things she has said so far?? And if not doesn't that make you sexist?? Something for you to think about

I do not care if you are a registered penguin.

Your rather lame verbiage gives a distinctive image of, ahem, inexperience.

user-pic

Yo, dude or dudette: WOMEN claim they want EQUALITY. That SHOULD include WOMEN TAKING RESPONSIBLITY for what comes out of THEIR mouths.

If she can be as trash-talking rude as the worst of MALES, then she can be CALLED ON IT -- exactly as WOMEN insist MAELS must be.

I don't for a second believe the call for a "PUNCH IN THE FACE" is other than FIGURATIVE. I DO know that Palin is the sort of thug-IN-A-SKIRT who will kick a man in the balls, then immediately scream that she "FEELS" "threatened".

I love women. But I will go after -- FIGURATIVELY, IN PUBLIC SPEECH -- a liar regardless genital configuration.

Those who want to adopt a different approach simply because Palin is female are the sexists.

When push comes to shove, and Palin MUST FINALLY face the music for her violations of CRIMINAL statutes in "Troopergate," will these same so-called "feminists" be arguing AGAINST her being subjected to EQUALITY IN SENTENCING? Or will they yet again be insisting, "Go easy on her: she's a woman," because women AREN'T as capable as men of accepting PERSONAL responsibility for THEIR OWN CONSEQUENCES?

Those who call others names are as direct result deserving of being called names. WITHOUT regard for genital configuration.

If by EQUALITY you mean physical threats from men and real danger in the home, then I guess they've already achieved it. Thanks for the Paleolithic viewpoint and the Cro-Magnon support.

The Ayers issue has been out there for over a year. If Obama's supporters haven't come up with a better way to confront it by now than "I'll give you *two* black eyes", perhaps the change candidate better hit the showers.

When you behave like that which you detest, you become it. That is what you should have learned from the torture that our nation did in Iraq, and Gitmo.


Why should the Skylark sing the song of The Guttersnipe.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uLoBEC5mNYI

user-pic

"When you behave like that which you detest, you become it."

We agree. But calling a guttersnipe a guttersnipe is not name-calling or personal attack when it is directed at one who is in fact a guttersnipe.

Genital configuration of the guttersnipe is only relevant to the sexist. By contrast, genital configuration is a specious "defense," a changing of subject away from the fact.

Debbie Wasserman Shultz could totally take Palin. And I'd totally love to see Debbie lose it and smack the folksiness right off Sarah's face.

However, that really isn't necessary.

People just need to stop being nice to her. Stop treating her like a fragile little girl and treat her like a realy candidate for the second highest office in the country.

When she lies, call her a liar. When she doesn't answer your question, refuse to proceed until she does. It's not that hard.

user-pic

That is FIGURATIVELY punching her in the face.

And I'd love someone like Schultz to go after, as she has in the past.

Figuratively? Oh. Sorry. FIGURATIVELY! The caps make all the difference I guess. Let me ask you something, hero. If we were in a real cafe and she were standing there, would you be saying this stuff? Would you actually tell her someone should punch you in the face?

Moving beyond the above diatribe, does it not give anyone here pause that Senator Obama did in fact have a relationship with William Ayers? The fund raiser at Ayers' home and being on the board of the Woods fund and working together at the Chicago Annenburg Challenge. I don't believe Senator Obama is a terrorist but he certainly has some questionable allies with questionable backgrounds.

And oh have you heard, that Jesus fella hangs around with harlots and tax collectors. He must be one of them.

Did Jesus really spend time in Brazil with John McCain and Charles Keating. Shocking, and here I thought both he and John McCain walked on water.

Your idiocy gives me pause. Not that I am entirely sure you will be able to read and comprehend this post, as it seems your acuity in the area is somewhat lacking.

Maybe the Times will launch a big-print edition.

Ayers is a freaking college professor. Shit he "did" 40 years ago is immaterial. Seriously, that's just lazy thinking to bring that up as if it meant something.

Jason, you're absolutely a lazy thinker. Ayers was bombing the public:

Later in 1969, Ayers participated in planting a bomb at a statue dedicated to police casualties in the 1886 Haymarket Riot.[10] The blast broke almost 100 windows and blew pieces of the statue onto the nearby Kennedy Expressway.[11] (The statue was rebuilt and unveiled on May 4, 1970, and blown up again by other Weathermen on October 6, 1970.[12][11] Rebuilding it yet again, the city posted a 24-hour police guard to prevent another blast.[11]) Ayers participated in the Days of Rage riot in Chicago in October 1969, and in December was at the "War Council" meeting in Flint, Michigan. Larry Grathwohl, an FBI informant in the Weatherman group from the fall of 1969 to the spring of 1970, thought that Ayers, along with Bernardine Dohrn, were probably the two most authoritative people within the organization.In 1970 he "went underground" with several associates after the Greenwich Village townhouse explosion, in which Weatherman member Ted Gold, Ayers' close friend Terry Robbins, and Ayers' girlfriend, Diana Oughton, were killed when a nail bomb (an anti-personnel device) they were assembling exploded. Kathy Boudin and Cathy Wilkerson survived the blast. Ayers was not facing criminal charges at the time, but the federal government later filed charges against him.[3] Ayers participated in the bombings of New York City Police Headquarters in 1970, the United States Capitol building in 1971, and The Pentagon in 1972, as he noted in his 2001 book, Fugitive Days.

Now, you can try to defend Ayers - he excuses all of his actions as trying to defend Vietnamese and that he wasn't using indiscriminate terrorism, though why that makes the NY Police fair game, I have trouble with - but the idea that 4 years building bombs and attacking public institutions is "immaterial" has to be one of the stupidest statements I've seen here, and I say that with some due admiration. Mixing it with a claim that others must be lazy if they disagree is worthy of some of the more absured utterances of a certain VP candidate. Do we become what we detest?

Now, look at here, Des. In my new Hive theory -- Hellstrom's Hive without Hellstrom -- you are talking to workers. They don't get any brain food. Makes them real good fighters, but not very smart. You need to find one of the smart ants to talk to. I guarantee you that talking to Jason and new10 are a waste of your time. I guarantee you Jason would hate the things Ayers did. He just doesn't have the capacity of connect them with Obama in any way. They don't give him the food he needs to do that. The other one? Good worker, but destined for the vats.

Hmmm, quite interesting, sounds a bit like Gurdjieff as well. Did you post this? Or are you saving those destined for the vats the horrid pre-knowledge of their fate?

user-pic

Did Obama know anything about Ayers' history? Did he approve that history?

Does it matter? Well, let's ask about the sexual affair McSame had with a Brazilian model OUTSIDE marraige. And how he chose a former beauty pageant-contestant for VP who is totally unqualified for VP but apparently qualified for a relationship with McSame.

And let's talk about not only Palin's for-before-against stance concerning the Alaska legislature's investigation of abuses of power by her which appear to violate CRIMINAL statutes, but also McSame's role as one of the Keating 5, but also his ties to gambling, and Abramoff and Ralph Reed.

So if I cheat on my spouse, it makes your hanging out with a bomb planter okay? That's a curious side of moral equivalence.

Anyone here got a real excuse for Obama & Ayers, or is this hand-wringing at its finest?

So, now we are comparing Senator Obama to Jesus? Wow, he really is THE ONE.

But you certainly can compare The Make Belief Maverick, to Judas:

He ended up with his thirty pieces of silver from Charles Keating, and he took out his wedding license to marry his current Sugar Mommy, while he was still legally married to his first wife. Judas would give him a big thumbs up on that.

http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/23316912/makebelieve_maverick/print

Only people I know who refer to Obama as Jesus are the Republicans. So you can take your "we" and stick it in your pocket.

user-pic

Republicans only refer to Obama as "Jesus" because they recognize that the "Jesus" they "pray" to doesn't quite come off as being the "Jesus" they heard about who said, "Turn the other cheek."

So they are seeking a better alternative . . . So apparently McSame is to be their new "Jesus," at least until they actually find the one who doesn't IRRESPONSIBLY sing "Bomb, bomb, bomb Iran".

Oh, for the mavericky maverickness of the One True Jesus the Republicans claim to have chained in their basement/s!

I dunno, I kinda like the title of the post. It sounds like something a 10 year old would say. Since the McCain campaign is being run by the Peanuts gang, I think it's appropriate.

I think the Obama campaign has a real problem with Palin in that they CAN come back and attack hard, but Obama is not running against Palin. He's running against McCain. The McCain campaign seems to want us all to forget that. The Obama campaign hasn't. That was clear in the VP debate when Biden went straight at McCain and essentially ignored Palin except to rebut her claims about McCain.

The Obama campaign has been smart so far. And when we were all screaming for them to do this or that and freaking out because we were sure that they sky was falling, they were playing their own game at their own pace. I'm sure they recognize this problem and I'm sure they're working on solving it.

No problem with Palin. Ignore the airhead. No need to engage in a brawl on her terms.

She is just making herself look shrill, mean, and desperate, which of course they are.

McCain has nothing positive to offer the voters, so he has to unleash the Hockey Mom without lipstick. Wink Wink. Nudge Nudge.

There's lots of ways to come back at Palin, and show she's vicious. The Wolf ad, the AKIP support, the Librarian firing, etc. We can pump up the volume on that, and people will get what she is, but without the direct personal attack.

I'm just feeling like somebody put an extra dose of asshole in the water supply this weekend. Posts on Palin the child abuser, McCain the baby-killer, now this crap.

Nice to see no posts on the economy.

If we ignore it, won't it go away?

It's here to stay - we might as well post about irrelevancies now.

Who says we Democrats aren't good haters? Last week I was on the mass trans coming out of where I work at the city center and some straphanger started raving about the republicans in that kind of loud voice that makes you wonder whether the guy is going back to his group home for some overdue meds.

Man he hated the GOP, and let us all know how much.

I kind of disapproved of his sentiments in that forum spoken like that, but inside I agreed with most everything he said.

Maybe I need some meds too......

spoookaaaay.

That reply above was to Desi alright but to the thread below.....

try again lux.

I love all those hangers-on with Tourette's. My favorite was the homeless who after a good rainstorm would find all the broken umbrellas and wave them around yelling that that's what's wrong with the system. Right in the heart of capitalist America, a reminder of something, a nagging feeling, like maybe I left the coffee machine on at home....

No, not going away. The economy is designed such that there is very little "give". Something happening in sector A very quickly effects conditions in sector Z. This works for the good or for the bad as it tends to cause virtuous avalanches or their opposite. Right now all of us from Reykjavik to Moscow to Suzhou to Dublin to Elmsville or caught up in the latter. The effort is going on to dampen and neutralize it by cutting off the instabilities of uncertainly that is dampening liquidity in the lending markets. But even if we get everything de-leveraged and reduce the overhang, and recapitalize the lenders, then there is still the wreckage down below to address and repair.

I think of it as an avalanche. We can quiet the upper slopes, but down below secondary avalanches are starting and carrying away trees, homes, etc...

user-pic

The Obama campaign is already giving her the ultimate insult - the one learned long ago in oriental societies to be the most effective - SILENCE. Obama now NEVER mentions her, period, in his campaigning. And Biden nearly completely ignored her in the VP debate, and instead kept rebutting her lies by keeping his attacks aimed on John McCain.

I notice sgwhiteinfla hasn't responded recently...

Could the threatening violence (however figuratively)to a vice presidential candidate have earned him/her a visit from the Secret Service? Wouldn't be surprised.

I wonder what are the blogosphere tripwires that set off such visits (if indeed, they bother)?

I think it's more likely that he doesn't get any extra McCain points for hanging around once he's lobbed his grenade.

Or JNagarya showed up to advocate for the muscle-brained and he got to go off in search of other low IQ areas of interest.

I'm still so upset over something I read recently I can't get my posts to wind up in the right places!

Billy, Desi, my contribution to this chain of remarks is above...(not that its anything really significant).

No prob, we'll track you down wherever you are.... ;)

Let Palin be Palin. Everytime she opens her mouth another moderate is nocked off the fence into the Obama camp.

I think what someone did forty years ago matters.

Forty years ago John McCain was dropping bombs on innocent people. Killing people because he was a God Loving Patriot.

Forty years ago Ayers started a group to protest the killing of innocent people in an unjust war. Ninty-nine point nine percent of all people involved in the Viet Nam War protest were never charged with any crime except exercising their Constitunial right to protest.

Ayers has never killed anybody or spent any time in jail for any crime.

Ask McCain how many innocent people he and his NeoCon friends have killed supporting various terrorist groups around the world.

This one is capable of a false analogy. We should smuggle some brain food in from the outside for it.

Leave a comment

sgwhiteinfla

user-pic

Following:
Followers:

Posts
Comments & Recommends


Favorites

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address