Weathermen Prosecutor calls B.S. on AYers-Obama "link"
In a letter to the editor published in the NY Times today, William C. Ibershof, who was
the lead federal prosecutor of the Weathermen in the 1970s (I was then chief of the criminal division in the Eastern District of Michigan and took over the Weathermen prosecution in 1972)
says that he is
amazed and outraged that Senator Barack Obama is being linked to William Ayers’s terrorist activities 40 years ago when Mr. Obama was, as he has noted, just a child.
and adds that
Although I dearly wanted to obtain convictions against all the Weathermen, including Bill Ayers, I am very pleased to learn that he has become a responsible citizen.
Because Senator Obama recently served on a board of a charitable organization with Mr. Ayers cannot possibly link the senator to acts perpetrated by Mr. Ayers so many years ago.
he closes with another blast from the past:
I do take issue with the statement in your news article that the Weathermen indictment was dismissed because of “prosecutorial misconduct.” It was dismissed because of illegal activities, including wiretaps, break-ins and mail interceptions, initiated by John N. Mitchell, attorney general at that time, and W. Mark Felt, an F.B.I. assistant director.
I guess coming from him this is stronger than my unpublished letter:
The whole thing is nonsense.
Obama has no connection to Ayers.
Obama did nothing.
Obama and Ayers were both on the board of some do-goodnik organization, each appointed by other third party folks.
Ayers held a fundraiser for Obama.
Obama never sought his support.McCain however was in effect holding fundraisers for Keating, and is connected to the Annenberg foundation that funded the same organization that Ayers and Obama worked for.
Unlike Obama, McCain actively sought the support of terrorist and criminal G. Gordon Liddy or served on the board of the neo-Nazi US Council of World Freedom.
Unlike Obama, Palin actively sought support of treasonous and violent (revised per comment: founder killed in a plastic-explosives sale gone bad, while collaborating with Iran) Alaska Independence Party.
------------------------------------------------
For those who did not see them, here is the NY Times front page article that looked into the "connection" and was actually pretty good on calling it b.s. (other than the fact that article was even done; at least third time NY Times has done an Ayers piece, compared to none on McCain's and Palin's terrorist ties). And here is the pathetic "balanced" with false equivalency NY Times editorial that followed.
cross-posted at Daily Kos where it's on the Rec llist.





Key line from the prosecutor:
"I am very pleased to learn that he has become a responsible citizen." (you and the whole city of Chicago)
Yeah, just the guy who actually led the prosecution is speaking up in defense of Ayers, and of Obama, and calling bullshit on this whole guilt-by-association smear job.
Case closed.
Unless you're a right-wing wingnut who can't let go of your own hate-filled ideology, even when the truth smacks you in the face like an upper right cut from Muhammad Ali.
October 10, 2008 11:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
Greg Mitchell of Editor & Publisher has also picked up on this:
http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003873017
If he were willing, it sounds like William C. Ibershof might make a good Ad for Obama.
October 10, 2008 12:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
Let the Obama/Biden campaign handle it. I am sick of seeing blog after blog about Ayers.
He can afford to hire the best lawyers, and the best PR firm if he wishes to defend himself. Mr Ayers came from a super wealthy family. He is a private citizen.
This is the critical time in the Presidential campaign, and Obama's strength is the economy.
It is the Economy Stupid, again, Except for Ayers Heads.
October 10, 2008 1:35 PM | Reply | Permalink