<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
   <title>Matthew Struhar&apos;s Blog</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/cavsfanatic09/" />
   <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/cavsfanatic09/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/cavsfanatic09//1576</id>
   <updated>2008-02-12T21:27:45Z</updated>
   
   <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type Pro 4.21-en</generator>


<entry>
   <title>I second this...</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/02/i-second-this.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.178211</id>
   
   <published>2008-02-12T21:27:45Z</published>
   <updated>2008-02-12T21:27:45Z</updated>
   
   <summary>David Greenburg&apos;s argument from Slate. Obama&apos;s rhetoric about Republicans being the party of &quot;new ideas&quot; is confusing. The Clinton administration was a bastion of ideas, particular, as Greenburg notes, the fusion of populism and neoliberalism.What Greenburg doesn&apos;t mention is foreign...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Matthew Struhar</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/cavsfanatic09/">
      <![CDATA[David Greenburg's <a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2183941">argument</a> from <i>Slate</i>.
Obama's rhetoric about Republicans being the party of "new ideas" is
confusing. The Clinton administration was a bastion of ideas,
particular, as Greenburg notes, the fusion of populism and
neoliberalism.<br /><br />What Greenburg doesn't mention is foreign policy.
Despite Secretary of State Madeline Albright's rhetoric about the
United States being the "indispensible nation" of the world, Clinton
really made an effort to see that international law and international
institutions become the keepers of the global order. This is evident
even in his political failures over issues about which he was (and
still is) correct, such as Kyoto and the International Criminal Court.
Also, despite his deeply regrettable failure to act in Rwanda, Clinton
set the precedent and framework for future humanitarian interventions
with our actions in Bosnia and Kosovo.<br /><br />Of course, Clinton was an
ideas man, and ruthlessly targeting your opponent over an issue on
which he or she has the slightest vulnerability was a Clinton trademark
(see Florida Democratic primary against Paul Tsongas, 1992). And that's
what Obama is doing -- criticizing the perceived failure of Clinton on
delivering long-term liberal reforms, such as the Clinton Health Care
Plan, and the decline of Democratic officeholders during the Clinton
years.<br /><br />Of course, the decline of Democrats in Ohio started in
1990, two years before Clinton ran for President. The so-called
Republican Revolution of 1994 could have been inevitable.]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Wow, this is cool...</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/02/wow-this-is-cool.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.178061</id>
   
   <published>2008-02-12T06:06:19Z</published>
   <updated>2008-02-12T06:06:19Z</updated>
   
   <summary><![CDATA[I had no idea TPM let you do this.&nbsp; What a wonderful service.&nbsp; Thanks guys!...]]></summary>
   <author>
      <name>Matthew Struhar</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/cavsfanatic09/">
      <![CDATA[I had no idea TPM let you do this.&nbsp; What a wonderful service.&nbsp; Thanks guys!<br />]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

</feed>

 
