Will the media regress to 1992?
This is a reposted and expanded upon comment from the Election Central Roundup:
Eric Boehlert has an interesting examination of how the press, after being accused of favoring Clinton in the election 1992, developed quite a combative relationship with Clinton even before he took office. The "honeymoon" with the media was declared over practically before Clinton was sworn in.





Link: The turnaround (Openleft)
Must-read piece by Eric Boehlert (the original)
(Warning: it's a bit depressing)
Yesterday, Mark Halperin proclaimed, at a conference at USC, that the press was absurdly in the tank for Obama, and that it represented the greatest failure of the press since the run-up to the invasion of Iraq. The most "disgusting", is how he described it.
Link: Mark (ruled by Drudge) Halperin on the "disgusting failure" of the press wrt Obama
Will the press execute a similar turnaround in its coverage of Obama? Will we be subjected to an endless parade of scandallettes? Well, if so, I'd like to highlight one potential topic for a scandal, written about in todays the Sunday Times:
Gasp. The new presidential limousine isn't a Prius! What hypocrisy!
The author goes on to say:
The tried and true "some people say" method of reporting. If you want to read the whole piece, here's the link:
The limo's not a Prius! What a hypocrite!
Any thoughts on any other "scandals" that we'll be subjected to? The puppy? The school?
FYI: thepeoplechoose has a blog entry on the Halperin comments: Halperin/media bias?