<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
   <title>here&apos;s Blog</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/here/" />
   <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/here/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/here//2319</id>
   <updated>2008-08-01T05:45:10Z</updated>
   
   <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type Pro 4.21-en</generator>


<entry>
   <title>CNN: scientist commits suicide as FBI closes in on 2001 anthrax</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/08/cnn-scientist-commits-suicide.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.206556</id>
   
   <published>2008-08-01T05:45:10Z</published>
   <updated>2008-08-01T05:45:10Z</updated>
   
   <summary>the title.anyone have info?...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>here</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Election Central" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Muckraker" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/here/">
      <![CDATA[the title.<br /><br />anyone have info?<br />]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>AP: Bigger war role for Congress proposed</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/07/ap-bigger-war-role-for-congres.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.203193</id>
   
   <published>2008-07-08T18:09:50Z</published>
   <updated>2008-07-08T18:09:50Z</updated>
   
   <summary><![CDATA[Now, i'm no constitutional law expert, but it seems to me like this AP story has left out some important information: &lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/07/08/war.powers.ap/index.html"&gt;Bigger war role for congress proposed&lt;/a&gt;The highlights according to CNN:James Baker and Warren Christopher chaired bipartisan panel on...]]></summary>
   <author>
      <name>here</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Muckraker" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/here/">
      <![CDATA[Now, i'm no constitutional law expert, but it seems to me like this AP story has left out some important information: <br /><br />&lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/07/08/war.powers.ap/index.html"&gt;<br />Bigger war role for congress proposed&lt;/a&gt;<br /><br /><br />The highlights according to CNN:<br /><ul><li>James Baker and Warren Christopher chaired bipartisan panel on war powers issue<br /> </li><li> Former secretaries of state propose new process between White House, Congress <br /> </li><li> President would have to consult Congress before starting conflict longer than a week<br /> </li><li> Congress would have to approve or disapprove within 30 days</li></ul>and starts out by saying: <br /><br />"<br /><b>WASHINGTON (AP)</b> -- Former secretaries of state James Baker III
and Warren Christopher say the next time the president goes to war,
Congress should be required to say whether it agrees.<br />"<br /><br />And from there the article doesn't get a whole lot better.&nbsp; <br /><br />Is this supposed to be a professional news organization?&nbsp; I kind'a would'a expected them to bring up the Constitution and The War Powers Act.&nbsp; <br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

</feed>

 
