<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
   <title>socraticgadfly&apos;s Blog</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/socraticgadfly/" />
   <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/socraticgadfly/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2009:/talk/blogs/socraticgadfly//481</id>
   <updated>2009-01-10T01:35:08Z</updated>
   
   <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type Pro 4.21-en</generator>


<entry>
   <title>Anchorage Daily News busted on chickensh*t Palin birth coverage</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/socraticgadfly/2009/01/anchorage-daily-news-busted-on.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2009:/talk/blogs/socraticgadfly//481.251169</id>
   
   <published>2009-01-10T01:24:26Z</published>
   <updated>2009-01-10T01:35:08Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Anchorage Daily News Editor Pat Dougherty has finally fessed up to a three-month coverup, namely that, in the weeks before the Nov. 4 general election, he DID have a reporter, namely Lisa Demer, investigating the (still-unanswered) rumors around Trig Palin&apos;s...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>socraticgadfly</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Muckraker" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="11009" label="Palin (Sarah)" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="11830" label="Palin (Trig)" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/socraticgadfly/">
      <![CDATA[Anchorage Daily News Editor Pat Dougherty has finally fessed up to a three-month coverup, namely that, in the weeks before the Nov. 4 general election, he DID have a reporter, namely Lisa Demer, investigating the (still-unanswered) rumors around Trig Palin's birth. The revelation comes as part of an exchange of e-mails between him and the governor, excerpted <a href="http://socraticgadfly.blogspot.com/2009/01/adns-palin-coverage-nothing-but-wildcat.html">on my blog.</a><br /><br />Texas progressive pundit Jim Hightower's most famous book is probably
"There's Nothing in the Middle of the Road but Yellow Stripes and Dead
Armadillos."<br /><br />Well, in case Dougherty didn't realize it before, in current Alaskan politics, there's nothing in the middle of the road but yellow editors and live wildcat Sarah Palin.<br /><br />That said, he should have realized it.<br /><br />In <a href="http://community.adn.com/adn/node/136415">his blog post</a> on ADN's editor's blog where he admits the deception, while at the same time dissing people with questions about Trig's birth (or Tripp's now) as conspiracy theorists, he tells Palin, in his New Year's Eve e-mail response to her, just how little cooperation his reoprter, Lisa Demer got from Mayor Whazzup and her staff and others.<br /><br />In spite of that, in spite of the election upcoming, etc., shades of the 2004 New York Times, he decided to sit on Demer's reportage. And still is.<br /><br />Hello???<br /><br />Here's <a href="http://socraticgadfly.blogspot.com/2009/01/adns-palin-coverage-nothing-but-wildcat.html">my blog take</a> on this. Needless to say, Doughertyis getting royally reamed in comments. ]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Some historic context on &quot;worst since Depression&quot; claims, please</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/socraticgadfly/2009/01/some-historic-context-on-worst.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2009:/talk/blogs/socraticgadfly//481.251153</id>
   
   <published>2009-01-09T22:43:50Z</published>
   <updated>2009-01-10T00:23:55Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Josh posted reader LG&apos;s comments about this earlier today, and I agree.Can the MSM, like CNN in this case, talking about 2008&apos;s job losses being the worst since 1945 put the job-loss figures into some historical context? The 1945 population...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>socraticgadfly</name>
      
   </author>
   
   <category term="11826" label="recession 2008" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="11828" label="recession 2009" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/socraticgadfly/">
      <![CDATA[Josh posted reader LG's comments about this earlier today, and I agree.<br /><br />Can the MSM, like CNN in this case, talking about 2008's job losses being the worst since 1945 put the job-loss figures into some <a href="http://socraticgadfly.blogspot.com/2009/01/cnn-fails-to-put-job-loss-figure-in.html">historical context</a>? The 1945 population was about half of today. In fact, it's not as bad as 1982, even.<br /><br />See <a href="http://socraticgadfly.blogspot.com/2009/01/cnn-fails-to-put-job-loss-figure-in.html">my blog link</a> for more about this vs. 1982, if you're under 40, and for concerns about the "worst since Depression" line becoming a self-fulfilling prophecy.<br /><br />Now, it is true, as Kevin Phillips has so well noted, that unemployment calculation methodology has been, to be blunt, "fudged" since 1982. That said, some of the fudging had been done before then, as Phillips has also written.<br /><br /><p>That said, as I note, there's a full percentage point difference
between 2008 job losses and 1982. Even with allowance for fudging, I
don't think you can say problems now are significantly worse than they
were then.</p> ]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Tripp Palin news rollout adds mystery to birth</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/socraticgadfly/2008/12/tripp-palin-news-rollout-adds.php" />
   <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/socraticgadfly//481.249810</id>
   
   <published>2008-12-30T22:21:44Z</published>
   <updated>2008-12-30T22:23:32Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Will the media, including the hometown Anchorage Daily News, start looking for answers to all the questions raised by Tripp Palin&apos;s birth?Those questions start with whether the kid was born on a Saturday or a Sunday, why Gov. Palin&apos;s office...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>socraticgadfly</name>
      
   </author>
   
   <category term="11007" label="Palin (Bristol)" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="11009" label="Palin (Sarah)" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/socraticgadfly/">
      <![CDATA[Will the media, including the hometown Anchorage Daily News, start looking for <a href="http://socraticgadfly.blogspot.com/2008/12/tripp-palin-news-rollout-adds-mystery.html">answers to all the questions raised by Tripp Palin's birth</a>?<br /><br />Those questions start with whether the kid was born on a Saturday or a Sunday, why Gov. Palin's office is stiffing the press so far as to not even issue a release (it did with Trig's birth), lie about why it's not releasing any PR and more.<br /> ]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>The Blago follies on display at Burriss-Senate presser raise many questions</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/socraticgadfly/2008/12/the-blago-follies-on-display-a.php" />
   <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/socraticgadfly//481.249804</id>
   
   <published>2008-12-30T21:43:57Z</published>
   <updated>2008-12-30T21:49:28Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Getcha popcorn, as Terrell Owens would say here in Dallas.Among the questions:1. Can Illinois Secretary of State Jesse White really block the appointment? Will state AG Madigan, also known as &quot;Candidate No. 2,&quot; be asked to rule if White has...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>socraticgadfly</name>
      
   </author>
   
   <category term="10381" label="Blagojevich (Rod)" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="11025" label="Blagosphere" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/socraticgadfly/">
      <![CDATA[Getcha popcorn, as Terrell Owens would say here in Dallas.<br /><br />Among the questions:<br />1. Can Illinois Secretary of State Jesse White really block the appointment? Will state AG Madigan, also known as "Candidate No. 2," be asked to rule if White has any such power, or is just a paperwork functionary in a case like this? As "Candidate No. 2," should she recuse herself if such a request for ruling comes to her office?<br /><br />2. How did Bobby Rush get tapped to run race-based flack? Is Jesse Jackson Jr. mad at being cut out of the loop?<br /><br />3. Speaking of this, if Harry Reid falls back to his original position of the Democratic party not letting Burris (or ANY Blago appointee) caucus with it, will the Congressional Black Caucus rise up? Especially since Reid welcomed Joementum, once again, with open arms?<br /><br />All very good questions. These and more are discussed further <a href="http://socraticgadfly.blogspot.com/2008/12/blago-follies-on-display-at-burriss.html">on my blog</a>.<br /> ]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Blogo ain&apos;t going anywhere and what the MSLBs are getting wrong</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/socraticgadfly/2008/12/blogo-aint-going-anywhere-and.php" />
   <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/socraticgadfly//481.249081</id>
   
   <published>2008-12-22T03:51:58Z</published>
   <updated>2008-12-22T04:23:57Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Who says Blago ain&apos;t going anywhere? Former San Francisco Mayor and Assembly Speaker Willie Brown discusses a recent Blago phone call.What the MSLBs (mainstream liberal blogs) are getting wrong? At least at Washington Monthly, pretty much everything in Stephanopoulos&apos; blog...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>socraticgadfly</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Election Central" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Muckraker" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="10381" label="Blagojevich (Rod)" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="11025" label="Blagosphere" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="11027" label="Emanuel (Rahm)" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="11029" label="Fitzgerald (Patrick)" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="6284" label="Obama (Barack)" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/socraticgadfly/">
      <![CDATA[Who says Blago ain't going anywhere? Former San Francisco Mayor and Assembly Speaker Willie Brown <a href="http://socraticgadfly.blogspot.com/2008/12/willie-brown-blago-aint-going-anywhere.html">discusses a recent Blago phone call</a>.<br /><br />What the MSLBs (mainstream liberal blogs) are getting wrong? At least at Washington Monthly, pretty much everything in Stephanopoulos' blog Sunday. Rahmbo pushing Jarrett by name is NOT a <a href="http://socraticgadfly.blogspot.com/2008/12/emanuel-pushing-jarrett-by-name-is-not.html">"pro forma call."</a><br /><br />What Angelic Funk didn't mention is any timeline discussion he had with Obama's authorized leaker, and how Jarrett being yanked fits into the one Blago-Rahmbo call and the four Rahmbo-John Harris calls.<br /><br />But, <a href="http://socraticgadfly.blogspot.com/2008/12/emanuel-pushing-jarrett-by-name-is-not.html">at my blog</a> post, the same as linked above, I ask the questions Stephanopoulos and Benen (among others, I suspect) didn't ask.<br /><br />And, <a href="http://socraticgadfly.blogspot.com/2008/12/willie-brown-blago-aint-going-anywhere.html">I agree </a>with Willie Brown; not only ain't Blago going anywhere, he's still firmly in the saddle and Fitz has a weak hand in his whole cards.<br /><br />Other points to note:<br />1. Obama's designated leaker, I guess, it's OK for him/her to leak, even with Fitz's cone of silence request.<br /><br />2. Something else Steve Benen overlooked; this official leak is obviously PR spadework for the Obama report/review of Blago contacts. That report will NOT come out Monday. It will come out no earlier than Tuesday afternoon, so that it can promptly be buried by Christmas feel-good stories on the AP and TV.<br /><br />3. Frankly, I wouldn't be surprised if Fitz hopes Obama, in a sense, does his work for him, his hand is that week. And, I wouldn't be surprised if Obama isn't obliging. Doesn't matter, Blago still isn't going away. And, if/when he does, he isn't going alone. Willie Brown lays out some more thought on that, with my analysis, at the top link, starting with Lisa Madigan being his Senate choice after Jarrett was off the table.<br /> ]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>It&apos;s Dec. 21 - where is Cousin Itt Palin?</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/socraticgadfly/2008/12/its-dec-21---where-is-cousin-i.php" />
   <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/socraticgadfly//481.249068</id>
   
   <published>2008-12-21T21:12:14Z</published>
   <updated>2008-12-21T21:56:21Z</updated>
   
   <summary><![CDATA[The significance of the date, in case Wasilla, Alaska dropped off your radar screen after Nov. 4, is that Dec. 20&nbsp; is the day, pubilcly announced by Sarah Palin herself, Sarah Palin's parents, etc., that Bristol Palin's alleged "bun" is...]]></summary>
   <author>
      <name>socraticgadfly</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Muckraker" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="11007" label="Palin (Bristol)" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="11009" label="Palin (Sarah)" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/socraticgadfly/">
      <![CDATA[The significance of the date, in case Wasilla, Alaska dropped off your radar screen after Nov. 4, is that Dec. 20&nbsp; is the day, pubilcly announced by Sarah Palin herself, Sarah Palin's parents, etc., that Bristol Palin's alleged "bun" is supposed to pop out of the oven.<br /><br />Anything you see yet on Memeorandum or Google News? So, <a href="http://socraticgadfly.blogspot.com/2008/12/dec-20-when-is-cousin-itt-palin-popping.html">what is actually up</a>?<br /> ]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Warren tells truth, Obama doesn&apos;t, on invite</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/socraticgadfly/2008/12/a-onblurtry-parentdeselectblog.php" />
   <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/socraticgadfly//481.248821</id>
   
   <published>2008-12-19T07:19:11Z</published>
   <updated>2008-12-19T07:41:50Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Salon&apos;s Mike Madden has the details about how the Obama HQ first tried to shuffle info about the Warren invite under the rug, then lied about who issued the invite, and went on from there:News of Warren&apos;s involvement in the...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>socraticgadfly</name>
      
   </author>
   
   <category term="6284" label="Obama (Barack)" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="10871" label="Warren (Rick)" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/socraticgadfly/">
      <![CDATA[<IMG SRC=" http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_m_xmzhIP3OI/SUtJJjYmZkI/AAAAAAAAASk/dtKhysTdUHA/s1600-h/Obama-Warren-Invite.png" ALIGN=LEFT>Salon's Mike Madden <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2008/12/19/rick_warren/index.html">has the details</a> about how the Obama HQ first tried to shuffle info about the Warren invite under the rug, then lied about who issued the invite, and went on from there:<br /><blockquote>News of Warren's involvement in the inauguration came out of the congressional committee working on the inauguration instead of from Obama's own inaugural committee, a wholly separate entity.<br /><br />At least initially, aides for Obama's inaugural committee said the decision had come from Congress, not Obama. In fact, that wasn't the case at all. <br /><br />"That was solely the choice of the president-elect," said Gil Duran, a spokesman for Sen. Dianne Feinstein, the California Democrat who chairs the congressional committee. Obama'' staff sent explicit orders for whom to include in the inaugural ceremony up to Capitol Hill, since Congress is, technically, in charge of that part of the day.<br /><br />"Sen. Feinstein obviously disagrees with the views of Rev. Warren on issues that affect the gay and lesbian community," Duran said.<br /></blockquote>As Madden noted, that was the wheels of Feinstein's bus you heard, at least trying to run over the slippery Obama.<br /><br />Beyond the lying itself is the nature of the lies of Obama/Obama campaign, speaking of "slippery."<br /><br />As I get read for Democrats to again accuse me, a left-liberal, of not being liberal -- the lies are <i>Clintonesque,</i> in the same legalistic way. I guess you DO learn a few things at Harvard Law.<br /><br />Meanwhile, in a mix of irony and petard-hoisting (for someone else, not him), Warren has already told the truth about the invite:<br /><blockquote>Warren's spokesman, A. Larry Ross, told Salon Obama had contacted Warren to invite him, not the other way around.<br /><br />In a statement, Warren said, "I commend President-elect Obama for his courage to willingly take enormous heat from his base by inviting someone like me, with whom he doesn't agree on every issue, to offer the invocation at his historic inaugural ceremony."<br /></blockquote>Wrong, Herr Warren. Obama has no imperial-clothing courage after all.<br /><br /> ]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Auto bailout dead for 2008; who&apos;s to blame?</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/socraticgadfly/2008/12/auto-bailout-dead-for-2008-who.php" />
   <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/socraticgadfly//481.247825</id>
   
   <published>2008-12-12T08:05:26Z</published>
   <updated>2008-12-12T08:28:57Z</updated>
   
   <summary>With the United Auto Workers refusing to accept Senate Republicans&apos; drastic take-it-or-leave it Hobson&apos;s choice on rapidly cutting union benefit overhead, an automakers&apos; bailout for 2008 is as dead as a Fred Thompson presidential campaign.First, there are advantages. Yes, advantages,...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>socraticgadfly</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="10398" label="automakers&apos; bailout" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="9974" label="Big Three" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="112" label="General Motors" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="10394" label="Japanese Big Three" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="10396" label="United Autoworkers Union" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/socraticgadfly/">
      <![CDATA[With the United Auto Workers refusing to accept Senate Republicans' drastic take-it-or-leave it Hobson's choice on rapidly cutting union benefit overhead, an automakers' bailout for 2008 is <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081212/ap_on_go_co/congress_autos">as dead as a Fred Thompson presidential campaign</a>.<br /><br />First, there are advantages. Yes, advantages, and I'm assuming that GM isn't so bad off it can't make it a couple more weeks, especially since part of this time includes normal holiday plant shutdowns.<br /><br />The&nbsp; next Congress won't enough GOP Senators to block any bill it doesn't like, including stripping out state environmental standards (California CO2), beating down employees, etc. And, Obama can have the bill waiting for his signature, and appoint his own czar.<br /><br />That said, passing a decent bailout this year would have been preferable.<br /><br />So, looking beyond last night to the big picture:<br /><br />Who's to blame?<br /><br />• Well, per the story, one problem is the Big Three have been in business longer in the U.S. than have the Japanese Big Three. They've got more pension overhead because they've got more retirees per current employees. <br /><br />There's no "blame" there, of course, but there is a reminder that we may be comparing apples and oranges at times.<br /><br />• Beyond that, as I've already said <a href="http://www2.blogger.com/posts.g?blogID=7532871&amp;searchType=ALL&amp;txtKeywords=&amp;label=automakers%27+bailout">about two dozen times</a> on my blog, the Big Three, and above all, the General, have plenty of blame to shoulder in different ways.<br /><br />And, the United Auto Workers has its fair share.<br /><br />Not counting enabling Michigan politicians, I would slice the blame within the industry as roughly 2/3 management and 1/3 unions. Besides BOTH being anti-environmentalist, the UAW knew enough of what was up, and wrong, on the management side. And, there is one other reason, detailed below, to fault the UAW to some degree. Within management, I'd give 2/3 of that blame to General Motors.<br /><br />Per previous posts on this issue, I've noted that GM <a href="http://socraticgadfly.blogspot.com/2008/12/nice-argument-for-big-three-bailouts.html">ignored early in-house minivan designs and hybrids research</a> back in the '70s, as prime mismanagement examples; even today, its Allison division is a <a href="http://socraticgadfly.blogspot.com/2008/04/hypocrisy-alert-gm-and-hybrids.html">leader in making hybrid buses</a>, but it still doesn't have a full-hybrid car.<br /><br />I've also blogged on how UAW President Douglas Fraser <i>invited</i> the Japanese Big Three here in the late 1970s, but <a href="http://socraticgadfly.blogspot.com/2008/12/uaw-cut-its-own-throat-20-years-ago.html">never made an effort to unionize their plants</a>, despite having had advance contacts with the Japanese equivalent of the UAW and despite Honda's first plant being in Ohio, not the South, for example.<br /><br />Both management and the UAW have plenty of blame on the "green" side, along with those enabling politicians. (Can somebody park a Suburban on John Dingell's front lawn?)<br /><br />In short, a lot of these problems are a lot older, and more festering, than problems in the financial sector. Whether they are fixable without a structured bankruptcy (and how that would even be done on a privately-held Chrysler is a question itself) is an open question.<br /><br />Finally, two wrongs don't make a right.<br /><br />Rather than using the argument about how Crazy Uncle Henry Paulson's been so lenient with his investment banking A-list buddies, the argument should be flipped - the incoming Congress has the opportunity to be just as tough with the financial sector as with the Big Three. (I'll have a post up with more of these thoughts this afternoon.)<br /><br />On, and especially given that normal assembly plant holiday shutdowns are just around the corner, Krugman (before he tried to qualify his words) <a href="http://socraticgadfly.blogspot.com/2008/12/our-economics-laureate-says-in-essence.html">is right</a> -- GM should die.<br /><br /> ]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Obama said about nothing new today on the Blagosphere</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/socraticgadfly/2008/12/obama-said-about-nothing-new-t.php" />
   <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/socraticgadfly//481.247799</id>
   
   <published>2008-12-11T23:21:29Z</published>
   <updated>2008-12-11T23:30:09Z</updated>
   
   <summary>In his presser today, Obama didn&apos;t really answer any of a number of questions related to the contacts between his TEAM and Blago&apos;s ADMINISTRATION, beginning with not talking about contacts between subordinates of the two, the timeline of Obama opting...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>socraticgadfly</name>
      
   </author>
   
   <category term="10381" label="Blagojevich (Rod)" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="6284" label="Obama (Barack)" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="9010" label="Obama Administration" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/socraticgadfly/">
      <![CDATA[In his presser today, Obama didn't really answer any of <a href="http://socraticgadfly.blogspot.com/2008/12/seven-blago-questions-for-o%20bama-and-few.html">a number of questions</a> related to the contacts between his TEAM and Blago's ADMINISTRATION, beginning with not talking about contacts between subordinates of the two, the timeline of Obama opting to give Jarrett a WH job rather than see her connected to the Senate seat, etc.<br /><br />I'm not saying Obama's done anything wrong; I'm just saying he's said nothing new about <a href="http://socraticgadfly.blogspot.com/2008/12/seven-blago-questions-for-o%20bama-and-few.html">what he knows/doesn't, when he did/didn't, who he told/didn't, why/why not</a>, etc.<br /><br />As for his press candor, he -- and even more, incoming press secretary Gibbs, can play their communications cards just as close to the vest as BushCo.<br /><br />Let me add, for people not familiar with where I come from, I'm a registered independent left-liberal who voted Green - Green, not Nader, no less - in the last two presidential elections, so before you say so, I'm not trolling.<br /> ]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Still not too late to elect real Green change in Louisiana</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/socraticgadfly/2008/12/still-not-too-late-to-elect-re.php" />
   <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/socraticgadfly//481.246844</id>
   
   <published>2008-12-04T22:49:07Z</published>
   <updated>2008-12-04T22:52:22Z</updated>
   
   <summary><![CDATA[The special runoff election for Louisiana's 2nd District is this Saturday, Dec. 6.Malik Rahim is running for Congress&nbsp; on the Green platform against incumbent William Jefferson, he of "money on ice" fame from a Congressional office refrigerator bulging with Ben...]]></summary>
   <author>
      <name>socraticgadfly</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Election Central" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="9544" label="Green Party" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/socraticgadfly/">
      <![CDATA[The special runoff election for Louisiana's 2nd District is this Saturday, Dec. 6.<br /><br />Malik Rahim is running for Congress&nbsp; on the Green platform against incumbent William Jefferson, he of "money on ice" fame from a Congressional office refrigerator bulging with Ben Franklins.<br /><br />But, this post is about change, not the same old, same old.<br /><br />Per Rahim's campaign bio:<br /><br /><blockquote>Malik Rahim is the founder of Common Ground Collective Under Malik's leadership, the Common Ground Collective opened the first free health clinic in the city of New Orleans, helped reopen schools, gutted over 3,000 homes that needed repair in the Ninth Ward of New Orleans, and provided direct services to nearly 200,000 returning residents.<br /></blockquote>You can learn more about Rahim <a href="http://www.votemalik.com/">here</a> and contribute to his campaign <a href="http://www.votemalik.com/contribute/">here</a>.<br /><br />This is a chance to help elect a truly independent voice to Congress.<br /><br />He can still use your money (he's already gotten some of mine) or other help, such as doing GOTV calls.<br /> ]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Moody&apos;s, S&amp;P, pay for ratings and Warren Buffet&apos;s quiet hypocrisy</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/socraticgadfly/2008/12/moodys-sp-pay-for-ratings-and.php" />
   <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/socraticgadfly//481.246510</id>
   
   <published>2008-12-02T19:23:39Z</published>
   <updated>2008-12-02T19:41:26Z</updated>
   
   <summary>First, the fact that Moody&apos;s, Fitch&apos;s etc get paid for proffering their ratings advice is nothing new. I blogged about that and its incestuous results four months ago. Amongst my links was Mish at Global Economics, who noted this:Moody&apos;s: &quot;Moody&apos;s...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>socraticgadfly</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Muckraker" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="9895" label="Buffett (Warren)" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="9897" label="Fitch&apos;s" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="9902" label="hypocrisy alert" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="9898" label="Moody&apos;s" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="9900" label="S&amp;P" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/socraticgadfly/">
      <![CDATA[First, the fact that Moody's, Fitch's etc get paid for proffering their ratings advice is nothing new. <br /><br />I blogged about <a href="http://socraticgadfly.blogspot.com/2007/08/wall-street-giant-ponzi-scheme-giant.html">that and its incestuous results</a> four months ago. Amongst my links was Mish at Global Economics, who noted this:<br /><br /><blockquote>Moody's: "Moody's has no obligation to perform, and does not perform, due diligence."<br /><br />S&amp;P:
"Any user of the information contained herein should not rely on any
credit rating or other opinion contained herein in making any
investment decision."<br /><br /></blockquote>As for Warren Buffet? A quiet or dirty little secret that the "Oracle of Omaha" doesn't tout, but the man who called derivatives "financial weapons of mass destruction" <a href="http://socraticgadfly.blogspot.com/2008/11/hypocrisy-of-warren-buffett-on-subprime.html">owns 20 percent of Moody's</a>. It's contained within a CondeNast Portfolio story noting how CDOs being "shorted" by more savvy investors were then having their "shorts" leveraged to create ... new CDOs.<br /><br />Given that the power for this leverage ultimately traces back to the blank check of Moody's, along with Fitch's and S&amp;P, it's no wonder the "Oracle" has remained silent.<br /><br />So much for him having been touted as a source of financial advice to Obama.<br /> ]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Support REAL change - help elect a Green to Congress</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/socraticgadfly/2008/11/support-real-change---help-ele-1.php" />
   <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/socraticgadfly//481.245892</id>
   
   <published>2008-11-26T06:18:02Z</published>
   <updated>2008-11-26T06:23:21Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Malik Rahim is running for Congress in Louisiana&apos;s Second District against incumbent William Jefferson, the latest in a long line of indicted or convicted Louisiana political shady characters. You can learn more about Rahim here and contribute to his campaign...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>socraticgadfly</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Election Central" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="6686" label="Congress" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="9544" label="Green Party" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="7905" label="Louisiana" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/socraticgadfly/">
      <![CDATA[Malik Rahim is running for Congress in Louisiana's Second District against incumbent William Jefferson, the latest in a long line of indicted or convicted Louisiana political shady characters. You can learn more about Rahim <a href="http://www.votemalik.com/">here</a> and contribute to his campaign <a href="http://www.votemalik.com/contribute/">here</a>.<br /><br />Wtih real change unlikely to come from either end of Pennsylvania Avenue, this is a chance to get an independent, third-party voice in Congress! ]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Support REAL change - help elect a Green to Congress</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/socraticgadfly/2008/11/support-real-change---help-ele.php" />
   <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/socraticgadfly//481.245891</id>
   
   <published>2008-11-26T06:18:02Z</published>
   <updated>2008-11-26T06:22:59Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Malik Rahim is running for Congress in Louisiana&apos;s Second District against incumbent William Jefferson, the latest in a long line of indicted or convicted Louisiana political shady characters. You can learn more about Rahim here and contribute to his campaign...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>socraticgadfly</name>
      
   </author>
   
   <category term="9544" label="Green Party" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/socraticgadfly/">
      <![CDATA[Malik Rahim is running for Congress in Louisiana's Second District against incumbent William Jefferson, the latest in a long line of indicted or convicted Louisiana political shady characters. You can learn more about Rahim <a href="http://www.votemalik.com/">here</a> and contribute to his campaign <a href="http://www.votemalik.com/contribute/">here</a>.<br /><br />Wtih real change unlikely to come from either end of Pennsylvania Avenue, this is a chance to get an independent, third-party voice in Congress! ]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Larry and the Seven Dwarves - served Buffett-style</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/socraticgadfly/2008/11/larry-and-the-seven-dwarves--.php" />
   <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/socraticgadfly//481.245679</id>
   
   <published>2008-11-24T20:39:07Z</published>
   <updated>2008-11-24T20:47:39Z</updated>
   
   <summary>First, I have to disagree with Robert Borosage. Policies don&apos;t evolve, Darwin-style. They are set and developed by people.Next, to the primary matter at hand.What else can you say about Obama&apos;s economic policy team, other than we don&apos;t officially have...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>socraticgadfly</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="6284" label="Obama (Barack)" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="9010" label="Obama Administration" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="9437" label="Stiglitz (Joseph)" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="9439" label="Summers (Larry)" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/socraticgadfly/">
      <![CDATA[First, I have to disagree with <a href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/245647.php">Robert Borosage</a>. Policies don't evolve, Darwin-style. They are set and developed by people.<br /><br />Next, to the primary matter at hand.<br /><br />What else can you say about <a href="http://socraticgadfly.blogspot.com/2008/11/larry-summers-and-seven-dwarves.html">Obama's economic policy team</a>, other than we don't officially have seven "dwarves"?<br /><br />You can already look at <a href="http://socraticgadfly.blogspot.com/2008/11/more-on-larry-summers-and-seven-dwarves.html">possible dwarfishness level</a> of at least some of the seven.<br /><br />Of course, I'm far from alone on lamenting Obama's lack of progressive appointments.<br /><br />And rather than just criticize, along with other critics, I can say I have had somebody better in mind than Larry Summers.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.josephstiglitz.com/"><b>Joe Stiglitz</b></a> has already, before today, come to mind. <br /><br />But, Stiglitz has loudly lamented the shortfalls of neoliberalism the last few years. The fact that he apparently wasn't even on Obama's short list indicates just where Obama's thinking is, IMO. <br /><br />As for Treasury AND other top financial positions, I can say (beyond thinking Stiglitz would have been very good) he should not have appointed any Goldman Sachs alum, given their track record. Beyond that, as I also wrote in a column at my newspaper company, I suggested an academic not connected closely to Wall Street. Without me naming names, there's plenty out there that would fit the bill.<br /><br />Oh, and for good measure, take note that Warren Buffett is <a href="http://socraticgadfly.blogspot.com/2008/11/hypocrisy-of-warren-buffett-on-subprime.html">not as innocent</a> of involvement in the subprime bubble as he has claimed.<br /><br /> ]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Gay rights hopes not yet dead in California???</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/socraticgadfly/2008/11/gay-rights-hopes-not-yet-dead.php" />
   <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/socraticgadfly//481.243155</id>
   
   <published>2008-11-05T23:28:59Z</published>
   <updated>2008-11-05T23:39:41Z</updated>
   
   <summary>The California Supreme Court is being asked to throw out Prop. 8 as having exceeded state constitutional bounds for the degree of its reach. Stay tuned, this thing could play out for months if not years; a possible scenario, and...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>socraticgadfly</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Election Central" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="5873" label="Proposition 8" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/socraticgadfly/">
      <![CDATA[The California Supreme Court is being asked to throw out Prop. 8 as having exceeded state constitutional bounds for the degree of its reach. Stay tuned, this thing could play out for months if not years; a possible scenario, and story link, is on <a href="http://socraticgadfly.blogspot.com/2008/11/gay-rights-hopes-not-yet-dead-in.html">my personal blog</a>. ]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

</feed>

 
